Vision

The Objective

Build an organization where AI is a first-class resource — not an optional tool. Where every role is designed assuming AI exists. Where humans direct and systems execute.

This is not an initiative. It's an operating system change. It's structural, not cyclical. It's permanent.

Why Now

The productivity gap. Traditional SaaS companies generate an average of US$125K in revenue per employee. AI-native startups like Cursor, Midjourney, and Lovable generate between US$2M and US$3.5M per employee — a 20x factor. This gap is not a temporary advantage. It's a permanent structural advantage that traditional models cannot close.

The valuation gap. AI-native SaaS trades at roughly 25x revenue versus 2.5 to 7x for traditional SaaS. Markets are repricing the industry. Non AI-native models are being discounted.

The window is closing. Teams already operating at the dark factory level (three engineers, no sprints, no standups, just specs and results) are accelerating. Every new model makes them faster. The gap isn't shrinking. It's widening.

What This Means

Work becomes more interesting. The repetitive, predictable, mechanical tasks are the ones AI takes over. What remains is judgment, creativity, strategy, human relationships.

Skills become more valuable. Someone who knows how to direct AI, who can specify what they want, evaluate what they get, and build systems that work, is significantly more valuable in the job market. Not in 5 years. Now.

Impact multiplies. With AI integrated into workflows, one person can do what used to take a team. Individual contribution has a disproportionate effect.

Let's Be Honest

Let's name things directly, because what goes unsaid creates more anxiety than the facts.

This is a reskilling. The nature of work is changing. Roles as they exist today won't be the same tomorrow. Adaptation isn't optional. It's a condition of the new reality, not just of this organization.

Existing skills don't disappear — they become the foundation. An expert who also masters AI is more valuable, not less. But an expert who refuses AI finds themselves competing against someone who has mastered it.

Results matter, not theater. Evaluation is based on what was built. Not on enthusiasm, not on the number of prompts, not on attitude toward change.

Status doesn't diminish — it gets redefined. If a professional identity is tied to a task that AI can now do, that doesn't mean the person is worth less. It means that task wasn't worthy of what they can actually contribute.

The discomfort of change is temporary. The discomfort of not changing is permanent.

The Approach

The operating principle is simple: replace "human produces artifact" with "human defines spec → system produces artifact."

This doesn't mean automating everything. Some things are better done by humans — judgment, relationships, complex decisions. AI is a tool, not a replacement for human intelligence.

The approach requires every person to look at their work honestly and ask: "If AI had existed when this role was designed, would it have been designed the same way?"

Probably not. And that's fine. Nobody designed these roles imagining what AI can do today.

The Target End State

An organization where every department has AI workflows in production. Where people spend their time on judgment, strategy, and relationships — not on repetitive execution. Where output per person is significantly higher because systems handle the mechanical work. Where a new employee, from their first day, works with AI integrated as a core tool — not as an option.

Guiding Principles

Automate before hiring. Systems before manual processes.
Evaluate results, not activity. AI theater is not transformation.
Transformation is non-optional. It's a condition of the new reality, not just of this organization.

← Back to home · The reference framework · The AI Lab · Glossary